It’s time to talk about vitamin D: up to one in three Spaniards show deficits of a vitamin that could be key in the treatment of COVID

Must Read

The best apps to organize your house

If you are one of those who likes to organize things in the house, arrange each space, or have everything in order, you should...

Lego Saturn V Review: A gem of space engineering

We built and reviewed the LEGO "NASA Apollo Saturn V" set - back in stores this November, it will be a product you won't...

You can get up to 5 months of free Apple Music thanks to Shazam

Apple has already won the hearts (and pockets) of users with the iPhone, iPad or Mac, among others. Now what you have to...

What is it and how to get a virtual phone number?

Having a virtual phone number allows you to receive calls on another line that has another phone number. It is useful, for...
Brian Adam
Professional Blogger, V logger, traveler and explorer of new horizons.

In the Marqués de Valdecilla, in Santander, they realized something strange. Many of the COVID patients who came to the hospital suffered from a significant vitamin D deficiency. They followed the trail, and the results, now published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, have confirmed their first impressions. 80% of the 216 patients who have been able to study in detail had a deficiency of this vitamin.

They are not the first researchers to realize it. Since May, we’ve been hearing about the links between vitamin D and poor COVID outcomes. There are researchers and politicians who have been pointing out for months that this – low levels of this vitamin – could be one of the factors common to all serious cases.

However, the issue was not clear. And it is that not only does it turn out that it is the only vitamin in which the general population shows systematic deficiencies, but we know that the ability to synthesize this vitamin is lost with age and metabolic diseases such as obesity are also related to low levels. Just the people most vulnerable to COVID.

That is, in the midst of a pandemic and with thousands of patients crowding the doors of hospitals, we could not know if we were finding a vitamin deficiency in people with severe symptoms because it played an important role or a simple consequence of the deficit being more common. in the profile of most affected patients. Now, with the perspective of time and new scientific studies, we have some answers.

What’s the problem with vitamin D?

Adam Niescioruk Hwzrjss8gwi Unsplash Adam Niescioruk

An essential part of what we might call the “vitamin D problem” arises from the nature of the vitamin and how we get it. Under the name of vitamin D we find two fat-soluble compounds: cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) and egocalfiferol (vitamin D2). The first is produced in animal skin “from a derivative of cholesterol and by the action of ultraviolet B rays from sunlight.” The second compound is also produced thanks to the Sun, but it is produced by plants, fungi and yeasts.

The role that this vitamin plays in the body, like that of almost all, is quite complex. We can find it involved in the metabolism of calcium and phosphorus (being essential in the development of bones and teeth), in the regulation of the immune system or in the endocrine function of the pancreas. Furthermore, vitamin D plays a key role in the development of the nervous system and its deficit, in the form of rickets, has tormented humanity for hundreds of years.

Although we have many sunny days in Spain, up to 33% of the population could face a vitamin D deficiency. Especially in the north of the peninsula. It is true that, despite these apparently alarming data, we cannot say that traditionally there is a serious and majority deficit in the population.

However, as companies such as the Spanish General and Family Physicians (SEMG) have been warning for months, this may be worsening with the confinement measures to stop the coronavirus by forcing us to spend more time at home and, indirectly, to take less sun. If the researchers are right, the coronavirus itself would have created the conditions to maximize its success.

Is vitamin D connected to severity of COVID symptoms?

Hospital Clinic Hospital Clinic

As the weeks go by, the hints and evidence that support the theory that vitamin D is helpful against COVID are gaining weight. Beyond observational studies that, as I said, have important methodological problems, there is a randomized clinical trial carried out by IMIBIC and the Reina Sofía Hospital in Córdoba that has provided us with data to take into account.

The researchers worked with 76 patients who had tested positive for COVID. A group of these patients selected at random, in addition to applying the standard treatment established in the protocols of the moment, were given a vitamin D supplement. The rest were given only the standard treatment. Their results (still initial) indicate that only 2% of the people supplemented with this type of drug had to be admitted to the ICU compared to 50% of the control group.

In this way, the idea is that the activation of the hormonal system D could reduce the risk of the appearance of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) got very interesting provisional clinical data that went beyond biological plausibility the mechanism and the previous epidemiological results. A few weeks ago, Iria Reguera explained how people with better vitamin D levels would have a lower risk of death from all causes, including cancer or cardiovascular problems; These data, it does not make sense to hide it, are also affected by the relationship of vitamin D, age and metabolic diseases.

Why don’t we talk about it?

Hospital Clinic Hospital Clinic

The interesting thing about the vitamin D question is that even if we don’t get strong evidence of its usefulness with COVID, there are no good reasons not to seriously study starting supplementation programs of a preventive nature. The prestigious magazine The Lancet in August already said that “there is nothing to lose with its application and potentially much to gain”.

This is so because, as Gemma Goldie notes, “it is not an unknown and very risky intervention. In the Nordic countries vitamin D is regularly supplemented in winter due to chronic deficiency and lack of light. “In the UK, for another example, the British Dietitians Association recommends including a daily supplement of 10 micrograms of vitamin D.

In Spain the situation is different and, for example, the Spanish Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics does not agree with supplementing. From their point of view, it is enough to try to sunbathe and increase the consumption of foods rich in vitamin D. Increasing this consumption is possible (our colleagues from Directo al paladar have compiled a very extensive list of foods rich in vitamin D), but quoting Goldie again, “the benefit of supplementing with vitamin D temporarily and in not excessive doses “seems to outweigh the possible risks.

Above all because “the risks of vitamin D are known and may be avoidable“. One of the most common, magnesium deficiency, can be remedied by increasing foods rich in it. Hypercalcemia, another problem usually linked to artificial supplementation of vitamin D, can cause nausea and vomiting, weakness or frequent urination to pain in bones and kidney problems (stones) In this case, a good control by the doctor of the amount of vitamin and a reduction in the calcium we consume solves the problem.

In public health there is an “unwritten law” that says if we have a cheap and safe intervention, although we are not convinced of its real effectiveness, the reasonable thing is to implement it. That was the logic that motivated the recommendation of the use of masks at the beginning of the pandemic and the one that could motivate the general supplementation of vitamin D. Why don’t we do it? It’s a great question that has many (and diverse) answers. However, seeing the slowness with which international organizations are acting on other issues, it should not surprise us.

Follow us on Google News